<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Fast Desktop-Scale Extrusion Additive Manufacturing · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1709.05918/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1709.05918/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Fast Desktop-Scale Extrusion Additive Manufacturing — mentioned by nickparker</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18633957</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1709.05918:18633957</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2018 04:36:16 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The laser penetrates the filament heating it internally instead of only heating the outer surface. It&amp;#x27;s near-infrared (808 nm) so it heats the small cylinder of filament essentially uniformly throughout its volume. It&amp;#x27;s also nice because they can vary laser power much more effectively than you can vary the temperature of a conduction surface. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.05918.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1709.05918/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.app-ph</category></item><item><title>Fast Desktop-Scale Extrusion Additive Manufacturing — mentioned by lylecheatham</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15841142</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1709.05918:15841142</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 02:51:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Checkout the second to last page for pictures: https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.05918 I think you bring up a good point about the lack of precision at high speed. I think the next big thing in this industry is going to be diving into the factors behind the &amp;#x27;sloppyness&amp;#x27; you mention. &amp;gt; I&amp;#x27;d like to know how well the auger is able to do this. I can answer this one! it&amp;#x27;s actually more like a nut on a bolt, instead of an auger, meaning it can reverse just fine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1709.05918/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.app-ph</category></item><item><title>Fast Desktop-Scale Extrusion Additive Manufacturing — mentioned by The_Double</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15833141</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1709.05918:15833141</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 18:12:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Link to the paper for those interested: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860416... edit: Arxiv link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.05918&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1709.05918/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.app-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
