HackerPapers

arXiv:1709.05011cs.CV

ImageNet Training in Minutes

Yang You, Zhao Zhang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, James Demmel, Kurt Keutzer

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Finishing 90-epoch ImageNet-1k training with ResNet-50 on a NVIDIA M40 GPU takes 14 days. This training requires 10^18 single precision operations in total. On the other hand, the world's current fastest supercomputer can finish 2 * 10^17 single precision operations per second (Dongarra et al 2017, https://www.top500.org/lists/2017/06/). If we can make full use of the supercomputer for DNN training, we should be able to finish the 90-epoch ResNet-50 training in one minute. However, the current bottleneck for fast DNN training is in the algorithm level. Specifically, the current batch size (e.g. 512) is too small to make efficient use of many processors. For large-scale DNN training, we focus on using large-batch data-parallelism synchronous SGD without losing accuracy in the fixed epochs. The LARS algorithm (You, Gitman, Ginsburg, 2017, arXiv:1708.03888) enables us to scale the batch size to extremely large case (e.g. 32K). We finish the 100-epoch ImageNet training with AlexNet in 11 minutes on 1024 CPUs. About three times faster than Facebook's result (Goyal et al 2017, arXiv:1706.02677), we finish the 90-epoch ImageNet training with ResNet-50 in 20 minutes on 2048 KNLs without losing accuracy. State-of-the-art ImageNet training speed with ResNet-50 is 74.9% top-1 test accuracy in 15 minutes. We got 74.9% top-1 test accuracy in 64 epochs, which only needs 14 minutes. Furthermore, when we increase the batch size to above 16K, our accuracy is much higher than Facebook's on corresponding batch sizes. Our source code is available upon request.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Sep 2017 to Sep 2017. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.