<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Microsoft 2017 Conversational Speech Recognition System · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1708.06073/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1708.06073/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Microsoft 2017 Conversational Speech Recognition System — mentioned by Wehrdo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16321851</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1708.06073:16321851</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 02:37:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Who am I to argue with your experience? I can only offer the current literature on the topic [0]. (They report a 5.1% error) &amp;gt; These systems typically use deep convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures ... driving the word error rate on the benchmark Switchboard corpus down from its mid-2000s plateau of around 15% to well below 10%. [0]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.06073.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1708.06073/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
