HackerPapers

arXiv:1708.04575physics.soc-ph

Information flow reveals prediction limits in online social activity

James P. Bagrow, Xipei Liu, Lewis Mitchell

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Modern society depends on the flow of information over online social networks, and users of popular platforms generate significant behavioral data about themselves and their social ties. However, it remains unclear what fundamental limits exist when using these data to predict the activities and interests of individuals, and to what accuracy such predictions can be made using an individual's social ties. Here we show that 95% of the potential predictive accuracy for an individual is achievable using their social ties only, without requiring that individual's data. We use information theoretic tools to estimate the predictive information within the writings of Twitter users, providing an upper bound on the available predictive information that holds for any predictive or machine learning methods. As few as 8-9 of an individual's contacts are sufficient to obtain predictability comparable to that of the individual alone. Distinct temporal and social effects are visible by measuring information flow along social ties, allowing us to better study the dynamics of online activity. Our results have distinct privacy implications: information is so strongly embedded in a social network that in principle one can profile an individual from their available social ties even when the individual forgoes the platform completely.

arXiv comments
15 pages, 4 figures, supplementary information included
Journal reference
Nature Human Behaviour 3 (2019) 122-128
DOI
doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0510-5
Subjects
physics.soc-phPhysics and Society cs.SISocial and Information Networks

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Mar 2018 to Mar 2018.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I wish authors of papers like this would publish an online tool to demonstrate their findings. I think a demonstration of this particular paper would be much less impressive then their misleading charts[1] try and make it out to be. For example, they excluded retweets but what…

      andrenotgiantView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.