HackerPapers

arXiv:1708.03486cs.CC

On the Approximation Method and the P versus NP Problem

Norbert Blum

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

First of all we give some reasons that "natural proofs" built not a barrier to prove P $\not=$ NP using Boolean complexity. Then we investigate the approximation method for its extension to prove super-polynomial lower bounds for the non-monotone complexity of suitable Boolean functions in NP or to understand why this is not possible. It is given some evidence that the approximation method alone cannot be used to prove a super-linear lower bound for any function $f \in {\cal B}_n$. Additionally, an overview on the methods for proving lower bounds of the non-monotone and the monotone complexity of Boolean functions is given. Finally, a personal opinion how to proceed the research on the P versus NP problem and also on proving a super-linear lower bound for the non-monotone complexity of a Boolean function in NP is given.

arXiv comments
The paper is the replacement of the incorrect paper "A Solution of the P versus NP Problem"
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CCComputational Complexity

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 2 HN submissions from Aug 2017 to Aug 2017. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.