<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Novel reformulations and efficient algorithms for the generalized trust region subproblem · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.08706/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.08706/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Novel reformulations and efficient algorithms for the generalized trust region subproblem — mentioned by LolWolf</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18443248</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1707.08706:18443248</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:14:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; that reference you can&amp;#x27;t find right now seems rather pertinent? Here it is: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.08706.pdf (This isn&amp;#x27;t quite the one I was thinking of, so I&amp;#x27;ll dig a little deeper, but it covers the idea). Some slightly more technical conditions have to hold in order to have vanilla GD work (since the function is non-differentiable at points), but a (very!) slightly generalized variant for convex functions—sub-gradient descent—works. &amp;gt; for an arbitrary non-convex function. Sure, but this is also obvious since it is NP-hard to reach global optima in arbitrary non-convex problems.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.08706/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.OC</category></item></channel></rss>
