HackerPapers

arXiv:1707.08124hep-ph

Scale Invariant Instantons and the Complete Lifetime of the Standard Model

Anders Andreassen, William Frost, Matthew D. Schwartz

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In a classically scale-invariant quantum field theory, tunneling rates are infrared divergent due to the existence of instantons of any size. While one expects such divergences to be resolved by quantum effects, it has been unclear how higher-loop corrections can resolve a problem appearing already at one loop. With a careful power counting, we uncover a series of loop contributions that dominate over the one-loop result and sum all the necessary terms. We also clarify previously incomplete treatments of related issues pertaining to global symmetries, gauge fixing and finite mass effects. In addition, we produce exact closed-form solutions for the functional determinants over scalars, fermions and vector bosons around the scale-invariant bounce, demonstrating manifest gauge invariance in the vector case. With these problems solved, we produce the first complete calculation of the lifetime of our universe: 10^139 years. With 95% confidence, we expect our universe to last more than 10^58 years. The uncertainty is part experimental uncertainty on the top quark mass and on $αs$ and part theory uncertainty from electroweak threshold corrections. Using our complete result, we provide phase diagrams in the $mt/mh$ and the $mt/αs$ planes, with uncertainty bands. To rule out absolute stability to $3σ$ confidence, the uncertainty on the top quark pole mass would have to be pushed below 250 MeV or the uncertainty on $αs(mZ)$ pushed below 0.00025.

arXiv comments
Typos corrected, numbers updated
Journal reference
Phys. Rev. D 97, 056006 (2018)
DOI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.056006
Subjects
hep-phHigh Energy Physics, Phenomenology hep-thHigh Energy Physics, Theory

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Mar 2020 to Mar 2020.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • > the vacuum we know is meta-stable It's not fully known if this is the case or not. If the standard model is accurate (which is a big if) then it's probably metastable but there is some still room for debate. See page 52 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.08124.pdf

      tempayView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.