<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.07702/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.07702/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? — mentioned by tsimionescu</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32620029</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1707.07702:32620029</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2022 15:25:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I’d be surprised if either scientists were trying to publish articles like that — or if they were, that they could pass peer review. The article we&amp;#x27;re discussing itself even links to one such paper [0]. All of the others she mentions are also published works - Penrose&amp;#x27;s CCC [1], the ekpyrotic universe [2], Hawking&amp;#x27;s no-boundary state [3] etc. &amp;gt; On the other hand, if you are working on theories that can extend into the early universe, it’s not unimportant to try and figure out where the model breaks down. Maybe t=0 isn’t possible, but t=1s? 1ns? 1ps? How much can we feasibly describe? Sure…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.07702/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25591061</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1707.07702:25591061</guid><pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2020 09:25:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Steven Hawking&amp;#x27;s paper on parallel universes&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.07702/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16980099</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1707.07702:16980099</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 18:58:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Stephen Hawking&amp;#x27;s Final Research Paper: A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.07702/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16625125</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1707.07702:16625125</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 01:21:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.07702/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16619544</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1707.07702:16619544</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:15:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.07702/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? — mentioned by kgwgk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16616834</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1707.07702:16616834</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:22:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;As the article mentions, you can read it already: https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.07702v2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.07702/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16616522</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1707.07702:16616522</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 06:41:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.07702/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? — mentioned by bvv</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16614996</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1707.07702:16614996</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2018 22:58:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;No he did not. The original paper is at https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.07702 This paper was not widely noticed back when it was written in July (both inside and outside the theoretical physics community) and still has not been accepted in a journal. In fact, it is rather unfortunate but most of what Stephen Hawking did in his latter years has been highly speculative; perhaps food for thought for other experts, but not worth reporting about in the mainstream media since it is (in my opinion) very likely to be wrong. I apologize for not debunking this paper with more detail but a scientist can…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.07702/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16614594</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1707.07702:16614594</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2018 21:47:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.07702/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16611398</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1707.07702:16611398</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2018 11:18:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.07702/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
