<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Low Frequency Tilt Seismology with a Precision Ground Rotation Sensor · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.03084/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.03084/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Low Frequency Tilt Seismology with a Precision Ground Rotation Sensor — mentioned by ISL</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21406242</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1707.03084:21406242</guid><pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 06:44:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#x27;s a great and important question. (doubly so for me, as constrained resources may see me leave the field, to which I have devoted my entire professional life, in the coming months) We are perennially grateful for the support we receive to do the work that we do. To a high degree of approximation, Einstein&amp;#x27;s predictions are very, very correct. We are trying to look very carefully at Nature because we don&amp;#x27;t think we have the whole story. It is possible that Einstein is exactly right. If so, we would never be able to describe the four forces of Nature with one unified theory. Today, we need…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.03084/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.geo-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
