HackerPapers

arXiv:1707.02968cs.CV

Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era

Chen Sun, Abhinav Shrivastava, Saurabh Singh, Abhinav Gupta

Abstract

The success of deep learning in vision can be attributed to: (a) models with high capacity; (b) increased computational power; and (c) availability of large-scale labeled data. Since 2012, there have been significant advances in representation capabilities of the models and computational capabilities of GPUs. But the size of the biggest dataset has surprisingly remained constant. What will happen if we increase the dataset size by 10x or 100x? This paper takes a step towards clearing the clouds of mystery surrounding the relationship between `enormous data' and visual deep learning. By exploiting the JFT-300M dataset which has more than 375M noisy labels for 300M images, we investigate how the performance of current vision tasks would change if this data was used for representation learning. Our paper delivers some surprising (and some expected) findings. First, we find that the performance on vision tasks increases logarithmically based on volume of training data size. Second, we show that representation learning (or pre-training) still holds a lot of promise. One can improve performance on many vision tasks by just training a better base model. Finally, as expected, we present new state-of-the-art results for different vision tasks including image classification, object detection, semantic segmentation and human pose estimation. Our sincere hope is that this inspires vision community to not undervalue the data and develop collective efforts in building larger datasets.

arXiv comments
ICCV 2017 camera ready
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Jan 2019 to Aug 2021. Found in 3 HN submissions from Jul 2017 to Jul 2017. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • Datasets are actually pretty hard to create. You can see several papers specifically studying ImageNet[0] including some on fairness and how labels matter. There's also Google's famous private JFT-300M dataset[1]. JFT was specifically made with heavy tails in the distribution to…

      godelskiView on HNParent context

    • In image recognition, Google asserted in 2017 that they were unable to find decreasing returns -- "Performance increases logarithmically based on volume of training data." Maybe for supply-chain and regression models there is a limit but it seems in deep neural nets maybe…

      tedd4uView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.