<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On the universality of potential well dynamics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.02389/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.02389/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On the universality of potential well dynamics — mentioned by nx2059</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24850858</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1707.02389:24850858</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 18:53:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;So in this paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.02389.pdf), (If I&amp;#x27;m groking it correctly) Terrance Tao seems to embed a Turing Machine in a vector space. So is using a single vector not a real problem, or am I just not getting it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1707.02389/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.AP</category></item></channel></rss>
