HackerPapers

arXiv:1706.10279astro-ph.GA

Extreme magnification of a star at redshift 1.5 by a galaxy-cluster lens

Patrick L. Kelly, Jose M. Diego, Steven Rodney, Nick Kaiser, Tom Broadhurst, Adi Zitrin, Tommaso Treu, Pablo G. Perez-Gonzalez, Takahiro Morishita, Mathilde Jauzac, Jonatan Selsing, Masamune Oguri, Laurent Pueyo, Timothy W. Ross, Alexei V. Filippenko, Nathan Smith, Jens Hjorth, S. Bradley Cenko, Xin Wang, D. Andrew Howell, Johan Richard, Brenda L. Frye, Saurabh W. Jha, Ryan J. Foley, Colin Norman, Marusa Bradac, Weikang Zheng, Gabriel Brammer, Alberto Molino Benito, Antonio Cava, Lise Christensen, Selma E. de Mink, Or Graur, Claudio Grillo, Ryota Kawamata, Jean-Paul Kneib, Thomas Matheson, Curtis McCully, Mario Nonino, Ismael Perez-Fournon, Adam G. Riess, Piero Rosati, Kasper Borello Schmidt, Keren Sharon, Benjamin J. Weiner

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Galaxy-cluster gravitational lenses can magnify background galaxies by a total factor of up to ~50. Here we report an image of an individual star at redshift z=1.49 (dubbed "MACS J1149 Lensed Star 1 (LS1)") magnified by >2000. A separate image, detected briefly 0.26 arcseconds from LS1, is likely a counterimage of the first star demagnified for multiple years by a >~3 solar-mass object in the cluster. For reasonable assumptions about the lensing system, microlensing fluctuations in the stars' light curves can yield evidence about the mass function of intracluster stars and compact objects, including binary fractions and specific stellar evolution and supernova models. Dark-matter subhalos or massive compact objects may help to account for the two images' long-term brightness ratio.

arXiv comments
Accepted by Nature Astronomy on February 23, 2018
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
astro-ph.GAAstrophysics of Galaxies astro-ph.COCosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jul 2017 to Jul 2017. Found in 1 HN submission from Jul 2017 to Jul 2017. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. The farthest star 1 comment
    • This line from the article is wrong: > Over nine billion light-years away. With a redshift of z=1.49, the light from SN Refsdal was emitted 9.34 billion years ago, but the proper distance at the current time (a/k/a the co-moving distance) is 14.4 Gly due to the metric expansion…

      xenophonfView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.