HackerPapers

arXiv:1706.08667physics.soc-ph

To slow, or not to slow? New science in sub-second networks

Neil F. Johnson

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

What happens when you slow down part of an ultrafast network that is operating quicker than the blink of an eye, e.g. electronic exchange network, navigational systems in driverless vehicles, or even neuronal processes in the brain? This question just adopted immediate commercial, legal and political importance following U.S. financial regulators' decision to allow a new network node to intentionally introduce delays of microseconds. Though similar requests are set to follow, there is still no scientific understanding available to policymakers of the likely system-wide impact of such delays. Giving academic researchers access to (so far prohibitively expensive) microsecond exchange data would help rectify this situation. As a by-product, the lessons learned would deepen understanding of instabilities across myriad other networks, e.g. impact of millisecond delays on brain function and safety of driverless vehicle navigation systems beyond human response times.

arXiv comments
Similar to published version in Science (2017)
Journal reference
Science Vol. 355, Issue 6327, pp. 801-802
DOI
doi:10.1126/science.aai8618
Subjects
physics.soc-phPhysics and Society nlin.AOAdaptation and Self-Organizing Systems physics.bio-phBiological Physics physics.comp-phComputational Physics

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Jul 2017 to Jul 2017. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.