HackerPapers

arXiv:1706.08606stat.ML

Cognitive Psychology for Deep Neural Networks: A Shape Bias Case Study

Samuel Ritter, David G. T. Barrett, Adam Santoro, Matt M. Botvinick

Abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved unprecedented performance on a wide range of complex tasks, rapidly outpacing our understanding of the nature of their solutions. This has caused a recent surge of interest in methods for rendering modern neural systems more interpretable. In this work, we propose to address the interpretability problem in modern DNNs using the rich history of problem descriptions, theories and experimental methods developed by cognitive psychologists to study the human mind. To explore the potential value of these tools, we chose a well-established analysis from developmental psychology that explains how children learn word labels for objects, and applied that analysis to DNNs. Using datasets of stimuli inspired by the original cognitive psychology experiments, we find that state-of-the-art one shot learning models trained on ImageNet exhibit a similar bias to that observed in humans: they prefer to categorize objects according to shape rather than color. The magnitude of this shape bias varies greatly among architecturally identical, but differently seeded models, and even fluctuates within seeds throughout training, despite nearly equivalent classification performance. These results demonstrate the capability of tools from cognitive psychology for exposing hidden computational properties of DNNs, while concurrently providing us with a computational model for human word learning.

arXiv comments
ICML 2017
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics) cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Jul 2017 to Dec 2025. Found in 1 HN submission from Jul 2017 to Jul 2017. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • Yeah, I looked it up yesterday and saw that artificial cognition is a thing, though I must say I am not a fan and I certainly hope this term does not catch. We are already knee deep in bad terminology because of artificial intelligence (“intelligence” already being extremely…

      runarbergView on HNParent context

    • I'd like to offer a somewhat contrasting viewpoint (although this might not sit well with people): deep nets aren't AGI, but they're pretty damn good. There's mounting evidence that they learn similar to how we do, at least in vision; https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.08606 and…

      deepnotderpView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.