HackerPapers

arXiv:1706.08431cs.DM

Bounds on the Satisfiability Threshold for Power Law Distributed Random SAT

Tobias Friedrich, Anton Krohmer, Ralf Rothenberger, Thomas Sauerwald, Andrew M. Sutton

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Propositional satisfiability (SAT) is one of the most fundamental problems in computer science. The worst-case hardness of SAT lies at the core of computational complexity theory. The average-case analysis of SAT has triggered the development of sophisticated rigorous and non-rigorous techniques for analyzing random structures. Despite a long line of research and substantial progress, nearly all theoretical work on random SAT assumes a uniform distribution on the variables. In contrast, real-world instances often exhibit large fluctuations in variable occurrence. This can be modeled by a scale-free distribution of the variables, which results in distributions closer to industrial SAT instances. We study random k-SAT on n variables, $m=Θ(n)$ clauses, and a power law distribution on the variable occurrences with exponent $β$. We observe a satisfiability threshold at $β=(2k-1)/(k-1)$. This threshold is tight in the sense that instances with $β\le(2k-1)/(k-1)-\varepsilon$ for any constant $\varepsilon>0$ are unsatisfiable with high probability (w.h.p.). For $β\geq(2k-1)/(k-1)+\varepsilon$, the picture is reminiscent of the uniform case: instances are satisfiable w.h.p. for sufficiently small constant clause-variable ratios $m/n$; they are unsatisfiable above a ratio $m/n$ that depends on $β$.

arXiv comments
17 pages
Journal reference
25th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA), 2017, 37:1-37:15
DOI
doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2017.37
Subjects
cs.DMDiscrete Mathematics cs.CCComputational Complexity

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Jan 2026 to Jun 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • As others mentioned, the link is broken. A quick look at the author's GitHub or HN profile doesn't have anything jump out at me. I will mention that there was a paper from 2017 on "Bounds on the Satisfiability Threshold for Power Law Distributed Random SAT" that constructed what…

      abetuskView on HNParent context

    • I think you have it wrong. Wolfram's claim is that for a wide array of small (s,k) (including s <= 4, k <= 3), there's complex behavior and a profusion of (provably?) Turing machine equivalent (TME) machines. At the end of the article, Wolfram talks about awarding a prize in…

      abetuskView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.