<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Massive gravity and Fierz-Pauli theory · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1706.08140/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1706.08140/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Massive gravity and Fierz-Pauli theory — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15309002</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1706.08140:15309002</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 02:28:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Firstly, thank you phys.org for including a link to the arXiv preprint. :-) Secondly, this comment grew a lot while I was composing it, and it turns into two comments: a crash-speed overview of some aspects of linearized gravity and a few paragraphs describing what&amp;#x27;s in this paper, forming a quick personal reaction from a pseudonymous nobody. Thirdly, massive gravity theory is not really new, and the 2010 date in the phys.org writeup refers to a solution for massive gravity in 4-dimensional spacetime by de Rham, Gabadadze and Tolley ( https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1232 ). Previously, stable…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1706.08140/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
