<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On the time lags of the LIGO signals · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1706.04191/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1706.04191/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On the time lags of the LIGO signals — mentioned by flexie</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18351823</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1706.04191:18351823</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 06:47:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The article keeps talking about &amp;quot;Danish&amp;quot; this and that. The only one of the so called Danish physicists quoted in the article is Andrew Jackson who is American. I believe this is the paper it all relates to: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.04191 None of the authors are Danish, but most are related to the Niels Bohr Institute. Andrew Jackson probably has a lot of Danish colleagues at the Niels Bohr Institute, which of course is in Copenhagen, and many of them might agree with him and some might have been involved in the study. He probably also lived in Denmark for many years and he might even have…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1706.04191/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.IM</category></item><item><title>On the time lags of the LIGO signals — mentioned by dnautics</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14675413</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1706.04191:14675413</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2017 04:35:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;no. LIGO released the non-processed data, and the other scientists processed it separately without using (presumably high-bandpass) filters that the LIGO scientists used. page 3: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.04191.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1706.04191/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.IM</category></item><item><title>On the time lags of the LIGO signals — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14585523</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1706.04191:14585523</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:07:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;On the time lags of the LIGO signals&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;65 points; 6 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1706.04191/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.IM</category></item></channel></rss>
