<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Neural networks and rational functions · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1706.03301/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1706.03301/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Neural networks and rational functions — mentioned by cozzyd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17387088</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1706.03301:17387088</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2018 16:21:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I would be less surprised if the paper claimed rational functions instead of polynomials. NN&amp;#x27;s are ~general non-linear functions which polynomials are very poor at representing (e.g. you can&amp;#x27;t encode asymptotic behavior in polynomials). edit: here&amp;#x27;s a paper about rational functions and NN&amp;#x27;s: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03301 . I&amp;#x27;m not really in a position to evaluate the claims, but author just won an NSF CAREER award so that&amp;#x27;s something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1706.03301/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Neural networks and rational functions — mentioned by wjn0</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16999340</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1706.03301:16999340</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 23:47:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;An interesting idea. A paper from last year showed that neural networks and rational functions efficiently approximate one another [1]. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03301&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1706.03301/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
