<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A formula goes to court: Partisan gerrymandering and the efficiency gap · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.10812/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.10812/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A formula goes to court: Partisan gerrymandering and the efficiency gap — mentioned by aqsalose</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14601192</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1705.10812:14601192</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 06:14:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper on arXiv about the proposed measure (efficiency gap) is worth reading: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.10812 I still have not about EG, but in general I agree with some of the sentiment of the paper I linked: these things are difficult to properly catch with just one measure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.10812/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
