<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Breaking Lorentz reciprocity with frequency conversion and delay · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.09548/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.09548/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Breaking Lorentz reciprocity with frequency conversion and delay — mentioned by rrmm</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14615200</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1705.09548:14615200</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There are lots of systems that break the reciprocity: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.09548.pdf from a few months ago has some descriptions. I think (not having read the Science paper) the issue would be that the underlying fundamental physics has reciprocity as a basic feature by way of Hermitian operators.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.09548/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.class-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
