<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Effect of partially-screened nuclei on fast-electron dynamics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.08638/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.08638/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Effect of partially-screened nuclei on fast-electron dynamics — mentioned by Libbum</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14607914</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1705.08638:14607914</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 20:59:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You can read it in full on the arxiv: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.08638 And yeah. The title of the (Wired) article is a little blown out of proportion. Important but incremental is definitely correct (I&amp;#x27;m one of the authors).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.08638/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.plasm-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
