<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Scale-invariant magnetoresistance in a cuprate superconductor · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.05806/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.05806/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Scale-invariant magnetoresistance in a cuprate superconductor — mentioned by ChuckMcM</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17681263</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1705.05806:17681263</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 16:33:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Heh, if knew what was going on I would be building some Tony Stark level gadgets already :-), but what I have been observing are the number of papers being produced around new observations or interpretations of the interaction between the electromagnetic forces and quantum effects. I have also observed over the years that, like debugging complex problems, once experimental physicists can repeat an effect that is not well understood, the underlying physics is more likely to be revealed. I wrote Dr. Shekhter and he said an updated paper would be available on Arxiv shortly.(arxiv:1705.05806) so…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.05806/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.str-el</category></item></channel></rss>
