<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Assessing the progress of trapped-ion processors towards fault-tolerant quantum computation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.02771/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.02771/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Assessing the progress of trapped-ion processors towards fault-tolerant quantum computation — mentioned by greeneggs</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14598882</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1705.02771:14598882</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 21:43:38 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you measure and reinitialize qubits? Testing fault-tolerant error correction with eight qubits would be very exciting. Is there a chance that you can roughly summarize noise levels, to give an idea of what to expect? Something along the lines of Table 2 (page 6) in arXiv:1705.02771 would be helpful. A. Bermudez et al. &amp;quot;Assessing the progress of trapped-ion processors towards fault-tolerant quantum computation&amp;quot;, arXiv:1705.02771 https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02771&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.02771/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
