<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: Field experiments · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.01693/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.01693/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: Field experiments — mentioned by perennate</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16007012</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1705.01693:16007012</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 04:04:06 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I am skeptical of claims that autonomous vehicles would decrease congestion even without taking into account this paradox (i.e., even if the density of cars on the road remained the same). All the claims seem to reference the same study [1], but per the abstract they are just simulating one circular lane of traffic. No &amp;quot;lane changes, bottlenecks, merges, or changes in grade&amp;quot;. Intuitively, it seems like once you add all these other factors in, autonomous vehicles won&amp;#x27;t help much unless deployed on a wide scale; for example, it doesn&amp;#x27;t seem like one driver can do much to speed up the merging of…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1705.01693/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.SY</category></item></channel></rss>
