HackerPapers

arXiv:1705.01481physics.pop-ph

Relativistic Generalization of the Incentive Trap of Interstellar Travel with Application to Breakthrough Starshot

René Heller

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

As new concepts of sending interstellar spacecraft to the nearest stars are now being investigated by various research teams, crucial questions about the timing of such a vast financial and labor investment arise. If humanity could build high-speed interstellar lightsails and reach the alpha Centauri system 20 yr after launch, would it be better to wait a few years, then take advantage of further technology improvements to increase the speed, and arrive earlier despite waiting? The risk of being overtaken by a future, faster probe has been described earlier as the incentive trap. Based on 211 yr of historical data, we find that the speed growth of human-made vehicles, from steam-driven locomotives to Voyager 1, is much faster than previously believed, about 4.72 % annually or a doubling every 15 yr. We derive the mathematical framework to calculate the minimum of the wait time (t) plus travel time (tau(t)) and extend two exponential growth law models into the relativistic regime. We show that the minimum of t+tau(t) disappears for nearby targets. There is no use of waiting for speed improvements once we can reach an object within about 20 yr of travel, irrespective of the actual speed. In terms of speed, the t+tau(t) minimum for a travel to alpha Centauri will occur once 19.6 % the speed of light (c) become available, in agreement with the 20 % c proposed by the Breakthrough Starshot Initiative. If interstellar travel at 20 % c can be obtained within 45 yr from today and if the kinetic energy could be increased at a rate consistent with the historical record, then humans can reach the ten most nearby stars within 100 yr from today.

arXiv comments
10 pages, 5 col. figures, 1 table
Journal reference
MNRAS, Vol. 470, pp. 3664-3671 (2017)
DOI
doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1493
Subjects
physics.pop-phPopular Physics astro-ph.IMInstrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Sep 2019 to Sep 2019.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • I got into the Wait Calculation[1] a few weeks back and made a Jupyter notebook out of it. At our current max speed (692,000 km/hr, stated max speed of Parker Space Probe), it would take about 173,000 years to get to that planet. We could instead choose to Wait and grow our…

      tunesmithView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.