HackerPapers

arXiv:1705.00154cs.AI

Classical Planning in Deep Latent Space: Bridging the Subsymbolic-Symbolic Boundary

Masataro Asai, Alex Fukunaga

Abstract

Current domain-independent, classical planners require symbolic models of the problem domain and instance as input, resulting in a knowledge acquisition bottleneck. Meanwhile, although deep learning has achieved significant success in many fields, the knowledge is encoded in a subsymbolic representation which is incompatible with symbolic systems such as planners. We propose LatPlan, an unsupervised architecture combining deep learning and classical planning. Given only an unlabeled set of image pairs showing a subset of transitions allowed in the environment (training inputs), and a pair of images representing the initial and the goal states (planning inputs), LatPlan finds a plan to the goal state in a symbolic latent space and returns a visualized plan execution. The contribution of this paper is twofold: (1) State Autoencoder, which finds a propositional state representation of the environment using a Variational Autoencoder. It generates a discrete latent vector from the images, based on which a PDDL model can be constructed and then solved by an off-the-shelf planner. (2) Action Autoencoder / Discriminator, a neural architecture which jointly finds the action symbols and the implicit action models (preconditions/effects), and provides a successor function for the implicit graph search. We evaluate LatPlan using image-based versions of 3 planning domains: 8-puzzle, Towers of Hanoi and LightsOut.

arXiv comments
This is an extended manuscript of the paper accepted in AAAI-18. The contents of AAAI-18 paper itself is significantly extended from what has been published in Arxiv or previous workshops. Over half of the paper describing (2) is new. Additionally, this manuscript contains the supplemental materials of AAAI-18 submission
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Aug 2018 to May 2019.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

  1. Numpy Clone in Common Lisp 1 comment
    • Author here. IBM is currently focusing on the combination of machine learning and reasoning, also called neural-symbolic AI [1], to combine the best of both worlds (noise robustness and explainability, etc.). I am from Tokyo and will join MIT-IBM lab soon to perform this line of…

      guicho271828View on HNParent context

    • This approach is very similar to a AAAI18 paper [1] that also finds a binary representation ("plannable representation") using VAEs and performs planning algorithms, but the difference is that they included some experiments for continuous abstract states. I personally prefer…

      ilovewhiskeyView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.