<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Undulator Radiation Collider: An Energy Efficient Design For A $\sqrt{s}=10^{15}$ GeV Collider · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1704.04469/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1704.04469/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Undulator Radiation Collider: An Energy Efficient Design For A $\sqrt{s}=10^{15}$ GeV Collider — mentioned by JumpCrisscross</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41620776</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1704.04469:41620776</guid><pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 22:51:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; that we shouldn&amp;#x27;t explore areas of science because cheaper science should be prioritized I’d put it slightly differently: if the best thing a group of scientists can come up with for $17bn is something like the FCC, there are probably better things to be done with those resources. It might be science. It might be humanitarian. It might be military. (It might be fundamental collider research. As in how do we do orders of magnitude higher energy physics without building solar-system sized synchrotrons. Or, alternatively, a series of proving experiments that aim to better understand what a…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1704.04469/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.acc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
