<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examples · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1704.03453/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1704.03453/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examples — mentioned by Sniffnoy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14379437</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1704.03453:14379437</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 21:19:51 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A note -- if you&amp;#x27;re linking to arXiv, it&amp;#x27;s better to link to the abstract (https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.03453) rather than directly to the PDF. From the abstract, one can easily click through to the PDF; not so the reverse. And the abstract allows one to do things like see different versions of the paper, search for other things by the same authors, etc. Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1704.03453/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item><item><title>The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examples — mentioned by mholt</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14379410</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1704.03453:14379410</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 21:15:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Since this blog post was written, the same authors have published further research on transferability which is what really makes these hard to defend against. They even present a proof of concept task that is resistant to transferring (although it is not super practical): https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.03453 If it interests anyone, I wrote up a bit about this and other threats related to machine learning models, a few weeks ago: https://matt.life/papers/security_privacy_neural_networks.pd...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1704.03453/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
