<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Adversarial Examples for Semantic Segmentation and Object Detection · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.08603/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.08603/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Adversarial Examples for Semantic Segmentation and Object Detection — mentioned by sjbase</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15192784</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1703.08603:15192784</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:33:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems easy to defeat with frequency bounds checks. But presumably there exist adversarial sounds that to a human seem like music, or gibberish, or a different phrase, but sound like &amp;quot;pay joe 1000 dollars&amp;quot; to the machine. The sonic equivalent to these: https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.08603&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.08603/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
