<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Electrodynamics and time orientability · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.05573/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.05573/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Electrodynamics and time orientability — mentioned by cinquemb</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23362609</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1703.05573:23362609</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2020 17:02:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That is an event as described when spacetime structure is defined as orientable, where as i&amp;#x27;m trying to get at what would it be described as if spacetime was non-orientable, and it doesn&amp;#x27;t seem like its just &amp;quot;Never&amp;quot;[0] I&amp;#x27;ve seen something that seems similar like what some are talking about here described as[1]: &amp;quot;If a spacetime is not time-orientable then a closed path exists round which the direction of time reverses. The simplest example of non-orientability is the Mobius strip. On the Mobius strip left-handed and right-handed cannot be consistently defined over the whole surface. A…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.05573/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.gen-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
