HackerPapers

arXiv:1703.05066cs.CR

Not All Browsers Are Created Equal: Comparing Web Browser Fingerprintability

Nasser Mohammed Al-Fannah, Wanpeng Li

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Browsers and their users can be tracked even in the absence of a persistent IP address or cookie. Unique and hence identifying pieces of information, making up what is known as a fingerprint, can be collected from browsers by a visited website, e.g. using JavaScript. However, browsers vary in precisely what information they make available, and hence their fingerprintability may also vary. In this paper, we report on the results of experiments examining the fingerprintable attributes made available by a range of modern browsers. We tested the most widely used browsers for both desktop and mobile platforms. The results reveal significant differences between browsers in terms of their fingerprinting potential, meaning that the choice of browser has significant privacy implications.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Sep 2022 to Sep 2022. Found in 1 HN submission from Jun 2017 to Jun 2017. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • There are a variety of uses that a website operator might make of a User-Agent header. Today, many of those uses are associated with identifying computer users, usually for tracking and/or advertising purposes, sometimes for access control, e.g., limiting access to only…

      1vuio0pswjnm7View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.