<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>End-to-End Learning of Geometry and Context for Deep Stereo Regression · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.04309/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.04309/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>End-to-End Learning of Geometry and Context for Deep Stereo Regression — mentioned by gtmtg</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17843654</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1703.04309:17843654</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2018 01:22:29 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Don&amp;#x27;t think it&amp;#x27;s exactly what you&amp;#x27;re talking about (I&amp;#x27;m sure there are other works much closer to what you have in mind, just can&amp;#x27;t recall off the top of my head) — but you might find PoseNet (https://www.cv-foundation.org/openaccess/content_iccv_2015/p...) interesting. Not explicitly 3D, but estimates where in a large-scale scene a picture was taken using an end-to-end convolutional network. With that said, I think there&amp;#x27;s still a ton of merit in classical geometric approaches like ICP — there&amp;#x27;s a real, geometric basis to why they work. Convolutional networks can demonstrate some pretty…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.04309/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
