HackerPapers

arXiv:1703.04234physics.hist-ph

The Early Scientific Contributions of J. Robert Oppenheimer: Why Did the Scientific Community Miss the Black Hole Opportunity?

Manuel Ortega-Rodríguez, Hugo Solís-Sánchez, Eduardo Boza-Oviedo, Kenneth Chaves-Cruz, Milena Guevara-Bertsch, Marianela Quirós-Rojas, Sofía Vargas-Hernández, Ariadna Venegas-Li

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We aim to carry out an assessment of the scientific value of Oppenheimer's research on black holes in order to determine and weigh possible factors to explain its neglect by the scientific community, and even by Oppenheimer himself. Dealing primarily with the science and looking closely at the scientific culture and the scientific conceptual belief system of the 1930s, the present article seeks to supplement the existent literature on the subject by enriching the explanations and possibly complicating the guiding questions. We suggest a rereading of Oppenheimer as a more intriguing, ahead-of-his-time figure.

arXiv comments
19 pages, Phys. Perspect. (2017)
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1007/s00016-017-0195-6
Subjects
physics.hist-phHistory and Philosophy of Physics astro-ph.HEHigh Energy Astrophysical Phenomena gr-qcGeneral Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jul 2023 to Jul 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.04234.pdf On why Oppenheimer didn't get the Nobel for his black hole paper decades before some else got it for a rediscovery.

      rurbanView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.