<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: identification, analysis, and impact · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.03779/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.03779/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: identification, analysis, and impact — mentioned by elevensies</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15490941</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1703.03779:15490941</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:02:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I just realized, I&amp;#x27;m severely confused about what Filecoin is, and possibly ICOs in general. I assumed &amp;quot;ICO&amp;quot; was analogous to IPO. If a token is essentially a bearer share that is coupled to the payment system. No reason you couldn&amp;#x27;t create the coin, run it privately until you get some revenue, and then offer it, as IPOs are usually done. But when I search Filecoin&amp;#x27;s website for &amp;quot;revenue&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;profit&amp;quot;, I only see references to the participants in the system, and not the token holders. https://www.google.ca/search?q=site%3Afilecoin.io+revenue…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.03779/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: identification, analysis, and impact — mentioned by bayonetz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14931036</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1703.03779:14931036</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 18:57:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;So far it&amp;#x27;s basically a listing of scam sites trying to masquerade myetherwallet.com. It&amp;#x27;s like 20 pages deep for just for that. I was thinking it would be something more akin to: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.03779.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.03779/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: identification, analysis, and impact — mentioned by AJRF</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14580276</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1703.03779:14580276</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2017 11:55:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You are categorically wrong about this. Ponzi schemes are financial frauds where, under the promise of high profits, users put their money, recovering their investment and interests only if enough users after them continue to invest money. Further to this, its qualatively provable, as you can look at the contracts and actually class the type of Ponzi scheme they are. * https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2017/06/01/2189634/its-not-just-... https://stratechery.com/2017/tulips-myths-and-cryptocurrenci... * https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.03779.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.03779/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: identification, analysis, and impact — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14460085</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1703.03779:14460085</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 13:36:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: identification, analysis, and impact&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;221 points; 121 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.03779/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
