<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.03107/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.03107/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization — mentioned by luminiferous</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14473717</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1703.03107:14473717</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 22:19:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I suspect it&amp;#x27;s because the Twitter bots inflate the user count of Twitter. It seems that even though Twitter&amp;#x27;s monetization is not the greatest, their valuation mostly comes from the number of users on Twitter. The reasoning process seems to be something like, &amp;quot;Twitter doesn&amp;#x27;t make a lot of money right now, but they have the ear of some 300 million users, and that&amp;#x27;s going to be valuable in the future when they get their monetization story correct, right?&amp;quot; And so TWTR prices are kept afloat. Bots probably degrade the user experience of Twitter quite a bit, but if Twitter aggressively bans all…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.03107/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SI</category></item><item><title>Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13856688</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1703.03107:13856688</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:52:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Up to 15% of Twitter Accounts Are Fake: Study&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.03107/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SI</category></item><item><title>Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13850157</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1703.03107:13850157</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2017 10:49:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.03107/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SI</category></item><item><title>Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13842486</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1703.03107:13842486</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:52:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;18 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1703.03107/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SI</category></item></channel></rss>
