<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deep Forest · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08835/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08835/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deep Forest — mentioned by thesz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47225276</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.08835:47225276</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 22:45:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; So NNs too really (damn autocorrect, it&amp;#x27;s rely, rely) on human insight and structuring upon which they can then build over. If so, one can repeat it with other basic models as well. It is possible to train deep decision trees forests [1]. Then I believe that it is possible to train deep convolutional decision trees forests. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.08835&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08835/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Deep Forest — mentioned by stochastic_monk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15580079</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.08835:15580079</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2017 16:59:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting; I&amp;#x27;ve ignored random forests more than I should. Thank you! I won&amp;#x27;t comment on your methods except to say that comparing classification over linear PCA against a kernel PCA in linearly unseparable data isn&amp;#x27;t exactly fair, and I think that providing an SVM performed on a different kernel PCA decomposition or a kernel SVM itself would be more illustrative. (Is your code available?) I generally think of neural networks as enormous meta-kernels. (Composites of &amp;lt;composites of...&amp;gt; kernels) This generally leads me to think of ways that kernels can be turned into neural network…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08835/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Deep Forest — mentioned by Seanny123</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13954966</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.08835:13954966</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:45:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Deep PCA: https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.3606 Deep Forest: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08835&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08835/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Deep Forest — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13773127</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1702.08835:13773127</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 10:47:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Deep Forest: Towards an Alternative to Deep Neural Networks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;350 points; 92 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08835/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
