<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Building a Completely Reversible Computer · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08715/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08715/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Building a Completely Reversible Computer — mentioned by cbkeller</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24751297</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.08715:24751297</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:08:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it&amp;#x27;s a variant of the latter -- IIUC no information can be &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; in reversible computing, so the output of a reversible hash function might be both the hash and some number of other outputs, all of which you would have to know if you wanted to reverse the hash function. It seems there is an analogy to be drawn to the way in which there can be no &amp;quot;waste heat&amp;quot; in a reversible thermodynamic process [1]. I thought this analogy might be a bit of a stretch at first, but looking into this a bit more it seems as though this is indeed exactly the idea with reversible computing, such that if a…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08715/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Building a Completely Reversible Computer — mentioned by adrianratnapala</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14152348</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.08715:14152348</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 22:23:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08715 is a link to the same article that might be a little easier to use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08715/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Building a Completely Reversible Computer — mentioned by tzs</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14151159</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.08715:14151159</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:54:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Link to the abstract: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08715 Generally, it is better to link to the abstract than to the PDF. If the paper gets revised the abstract page page&amp;#x27;s PDF link will point to the latest version of the paper (with links available to prior revisions). The direct PDF link will remain stuck with the old version.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08715/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Building a Completely Reversible Computer — mentioned by brudgers</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14147718</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.08715:14147718</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:57:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Direct link to paper at arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.08715.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08715/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Building a Completely Reversible Computer — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14146677</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:1702.08715:14146677</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:11:14 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Building a Completely Reversible Computer&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;90 points; 63 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08715/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
