<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08608/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08608/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning — mentioned by 1_over_n</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21958517</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.08608:21958517</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:48:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great point. There is a general lack of understanding about what it means for models to be interpretable &amp;amp; explainable. These words get thrown around often by people who don&amp;#x27;t understand the definition, and also the trade off with accuracy. Some papers i found interesting on the subject: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03490 https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.03886 https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.07552 https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08608 (i found this was a good sumary of the issues)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08608/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item><item><title>Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning — mentioned by jclos</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17565605</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.08608:17565605</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:30:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Interpretable ML [1] is a small online book on interpretable methods. Even if the content itself is rather shallow, it has links to a lot of more focused papers on the topic. Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning is one of the most thorough papers on interpretable ML that I have come across. The main author, Finale Doshi-Velez, has a done a lot of interesting work on interpretability [3]. [1] https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/ [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08608 [3] https://finale.seas.harvard.edu/publications&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.08608/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
