HackerPapers

arXiv:1702.05648physics.hist-ph

Fundamental Theories and Epistemic Shifts: Can History of Science Serve as a Guide?

Helge Kragh

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The present discussion concerning certain fundamental physical theories (such as string theory and multiverse cosmology) has reopened the demarcation problem between science and non-science. While parts of the physics community see the situation as a beginning epistemic shift in what defines science, others deny that the traditional criterion of empirical testability can or should be changed. As demonstrated by the history of physics, it is not the first time that drastic revisions of theory assessment have been proposed. Although historical reflection has little to offer modern physicists in a technical sense, it does offer a broader and more nuanced perspective on the present debate. This paper suggests that history of science is of some indirect value to modern physicists and philosophers dealing with string theory, multiverse scenarios, and related theoretical ideas.

arXiv comments
19 pages. Invited talk given to a conference in Munich, 7-9 December 2015, on "Why Trust a Theory?"
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
physics.hist-phHistory and Philosophy of Physics

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Mar 2017 to Mar 2017. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.