<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On the Bit Complexity of Sum-of-Squares Proofs · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.05139/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.05139/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On the Bit Complexity of Sum-of-Squares Proofs — mentioned by NotOscarWilde</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19009927</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.05139:19009927</guid><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2019 01:56:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Any context for why it appeared just now? On a personal note, it is almost eerie that it appeared just as I finished a week in Chile at a workshop [1] looking into Buchberger&amp;#x27;s algorithm and the connections between Gröbner bases and bit complexity of proofs via sums of squares [2, 3]. [1]: https://sites.google.com/view/vverdugo/events/hierarchies-an... [2]: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~odonnell/papers/sos-automatizability... [3]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.05139&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.05139/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CC</category></item></channel></rss>
