<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Knot traces and concordance · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.03974/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.03974/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Knot traces and concordance — mentioned by kmill</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23243938</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.03974:23243938</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 06:39:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, it&amp;#x27;s pretty cool! On one hand you have knot traces, which are spaces that completely determine whether a knot is slice, and on the other you have the Rassmussen s-invariant, which can sometimes tell whether a knot isn&amp;#x27;t slice. It turns out that knot traces contain different information from the s-invariant. One way sliceness is studied is through knot concordance, which is a certain restricted kind of deformation of a knot through 4-d space. All slice knots are concordant to each other. The Rasmussen s-invariant is invariant under concordance. So, the particular pair of knots C and K&amp;#x27;…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.03974/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.GT</category></item></channel></rss>
