<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>$2^\infty$-Selmer groups, $2^\infty$-class groups, and Goldfeld's conjecture · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.02325/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.02325/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>$2^\infty$-Selmer groups, $2^\infty$-class groups, and Goldfeld's conjecture — mentioned by throwaway080383</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18423461</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.02325:18423461</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2018 20:56:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s not accurate. Looking at the arxiv link (https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.02325), the idea is you fix some elliptic curve E, and you look at its &amp;quot;twists&amp;quot; E^d, where the parameter d is a nonzero integer. If you only look at twists where |d| &amp;lt; N, you can ask &amp;quot;What proportion of these are rank zero, rank one, rank two, ...?&amp;quot; The Theorem in the paper is that as you let N go off to infinity, these proportions tend to 1/2, 1/2, 0, 0, 0, ... respectively. Here&amp;#x27;s the thing: this does not correspond to a measure on the set of rational elliptic curves, and indeed, there is no reasonable way to define a…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.02325/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
