<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>EPFL Lectures on General Relativity as a Quantum Field Theory · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.00319/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.00319/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>EPFL Lectures on General Relativity as a Quantum Field Theory — mentioned by raattgift</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36677635</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.00319:36677635</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 07:37:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;And now for something not completely different: an introductory lecture in Perturbative Quantum Gravity (PQG) by Prof. John Donoghue. The lecture is one in the Basics of Quantum Gravity online school sponsored by https://isqg.org/ the International Society for Quantum Gravity. PQG stands in contrast to the approach in the fine article at the top (&amp;quot;TFA&amp;quot;) and to semiclassical gravity. By coincidence a retweet this morning re-surfaced a tweet from a couple of weeks ago by @BahramShakerin linking to these three 2023 lectures in Perturbative Quantum Gravity given a few weeks ago at École…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.00319/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item><item><title>EPFL Lectures on General Relativity as a Quantum Field Theory — mentioned by codethief</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35704712</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1702.00319:35704712</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:32:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; If gravity wasn&amp;#x27;t self interacting it wouldn&amp;#x27;t follow the shortest path that gravity itself creates. I don&amp;#x27;t know if this is the right way to think about this. Gravity follows all paths. In a sense, it is the path. Or, as Hawking described it[0]: &amp;gt; [Gravity] shapes the arena in which it acts, unlike other fields which act in a fixed spacetime background. Back to your comment: &amp;gt; So gravity is almost certainly self interacting. I&amp;#x27;m confused by the &amp;quot;almost certainly&amp;quot;. I think this has long been established[1], but for entirely different reasons: The Einstein field equations are highly…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1702.00319/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-th</category></item></channel></rss>
