<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Network Backboning with Noisy Data · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.07336/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.07336/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Network Backboning with Noisy Data — mentioned by mikk14</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22179496</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1701.07336:22179496</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:43:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;#x27;re interested, in the scientific literature this problem is known as &amp;quot;network backboning&amp;quot;. Basically you have all nodes connected to practically all other nodes with weighted edges, and you want to know which are the edges with statistically significant weights. I wrote on this topic [1]. My method [2] basically uses simple counts on edge weights, and then estimates the expected edge weight and its variance using Bayesian priors. It then attaches a t-score or p-value to each edge, and then you can filter out edges with too low t-score. The idea is that weak edges can still be…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.07336/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.soc-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
