<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.05369/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.05369/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networks — mentioned by tysam_and</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37585926</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1701.05369:37585926</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:06:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;DL researcher here, it&amp;#x27;s also hard I think because experimentally many of us have noted (also some research on this) that there&amp;#x27;s a critical early phase to learning that conditions the network a certain way, and adding and/or removing layers later seems to actually be quite difficult (removing easier than adding, by far, esp w/ something like variational dropout [yes, i cite the old deep magicks]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.05369)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.05369/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
