<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.04862/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.04862/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networks — mentioned by nealeratzlaff</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16056640</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1701.04862:16056640</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 22:53:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I think for most people that hurdle of understanding is immense, and isn&amp;#x27;t likely to get any better. ML/DL infrastructure will continue to improve and deploying AI systems will become more accessible as time goes on. But I don&amp;#x27;t see familiarity with (non) convex optimization, statistical learning, topology, etc. becoming mainstream. Without these its hard to see a reasonable path forward for AI. For me this year in DL was a lot narrower. it mostly revolved around systems becoming more human in capability. I think most of this is in the article already: We can now hopefully say that ImageNet…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.04862/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>stat.ML</category></item></channel></rss>
