<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantum Annealing amid Local Ruggedness and Global Frustration · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.04579/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.04579/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantum Annealing amid Local Ruggedness and Global Frustration — mentioned by cwillu</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34664795</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1701.04579:34664795</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:40:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The short answer is because D-Wave machines are useless for actual problems. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/05/24/q-and-a-wi... goes into the details, very little has changed in ten years. “One thing this means, in particular, is that any claims by D-Wave that the practical value of quantum annealing has already been demonstrated need to be taken with a huge grain of salt.” https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/d-wave-scientists... “D-wave machines are a long way from showing the exponential speed increase over classical computers that their advocates hope to see. But in a…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.04579/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
