HackerPapers

arXiv:1701.03369astro-ph.CO

Generalizing MOND to explain the missing mass in galaxy clusters

Alistair Hodson, Hongsheng Zhao

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) is a gravitational framework designed to explain the astronomical observations in the Universe without the inclusion of particle dark matter. Modified Newtonian Dynamics, in its current form, cannot explain the missing mass in galaxy clusters without the inclusion of some extra mass, be it in the form of neutrinos or non-luminous baryonic matter. We investigate whether the MOND framework can be generalized to account for the missing mass in galaxy clusters by boosting gravity in high gravitational potential regions. We examine and review Extended MOND (EMOND), which was designed to increase the MOND scale acceleration in high potential regions, thereby boosting the gravity in clusters. We seek to investigate galaxy cluster mass profiles in the context of MOND with the primary aim at explaining the missing mass problem fully without the need for dark matter. Using the assumption that the clusters are in hydrostatic equilibrium, we can compute the dynamical mass of each cluster and compare the result to the predicted mass of the EMOND formalism. We find that EMOND has some success in fitting some clusters, but overall has issues when trying to explain the mass deficit fully. We also investigate an empirical relation to solve the cluster problem, which is found by analysing the cluster data and is based on the MOND paradigm. We discuss the limitations in the text.

arXiv comments
17 pages, 22 Figures, Accepted to A&A (In press)
Journal reference
A&A 598, A127 (2017)
DOI
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629358
Subjects
astro-ph.COCosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from May 2023 to May 2023.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • [part 2/2] The result discussed at the link above comes from study of a the X-ray luminous and large MACS J1149.5+2223 from the MAssive Cluster Survey (MACS, <https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/320958>), redshift ~ 0.544 (around 5 billion light-years distance). As with…

      raattgiftView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.