<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ray mapping approach in double freeform surface design for collimated beam shaping beyond the paraxial approximation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.03076/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.03076/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Ray mapping approach in double freeform surface design for collimated beam shaping beyond the paraxial approximation — mentioned by djmips</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20399547</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:1701.03076:20399547</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:18:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I voted for your comment because it&amp;#x27;s interesting but I don&amp;#x27;t agree that the example you linked is the same problem as solved in this post. But that is an opinion because I&amp;#x27;m not informed enough to know for sure. Meanwhile I did dig up a paper related to mapping radiance with a shaped lens like the artist you linked. It&amp;#x27;s a cool topic! https://arxiv.org/pdf/1701.03076.pdf&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/1701.03076/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.optics</category></item></channel></rss>
