DeepStack: Expert-Level Artificial Intelligence in No-Limit Poker · HackerPapers discussions

DeepStack: Expert-Level Artificial Intelligence in No-Limit Poker — mentioned by mastazi

Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:18:34 GMT

non-pdf link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.01724

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

DeepStack: Expert-Level Artificial Intelligence in No-Limit Poker — mentioned by LeanderK

Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:06:22 GMT

How can one create visualisations like Figure 3 (assuming it's latex)[0]? I have to write my Bachelor thesis soon and need to improve my latex-skills. I only know to to use the math-mode and write text. [0] the paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1701.01724.pdf

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

DeepStack: Expert-Level Artificial Intelligence in No-Limit Poker — mentioned by foob

Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:22:51 GMT

They're included in the arXiv version of the paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.01724

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

DeepStack: Expert-Level Artificial Intelligence in No-Limit Poker — mentioned by sagivo

Mon, 23 Jan 2017 05:46:03 GMT

what about - https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.01724

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

DeepStack: Expert-Level Artificial Intelligence in No-Limit Poker — mentioned by lucidrains

Mon, 23 Jan 2017 03:09:34 GMT

They should do a Libratus vs Deepstack tournament https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.01724

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

DeepStack: Expert-Level Artificial Intelligence in No-Limit Poker — mentioned by conistonwater

Mon, 09 Jan 2017 22:21:20 GMT

FWIW, the win rate was -91mbb/g, and so they reported the probability of being equal in skill somewhere between 5% and 10%, hence the "tie". The introduction to the other poker paper on HN now (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1701.01724v1.pdf), by a different team, from Alberta, is rather less gracious and says it was a "huge margin of victory". I think that whatever the interpretation, his video makes it clear he didn't understand any of this.

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

DeepStack: Expert-Level Artificial Intelligence in No-Limit Poker — HN submission

Mon, 09 Jan 2017 13:14:33 GMT

DeepStack: Expert-Level Artificial Intelligence in No-Limit Poker

102 points; 47 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.